Featured Post

Conservatism, Reaction, and the Elder's Responsibility: A Message to My Age Grade

Image
Conservatism, Reaction, and the Elder's Responsibility: A Message to My Age Grade Great Day, Fam. This one right here? It’s not for everyone. If you’re not at or approaching Eldership—defined in our tribe as about 55 years old and up—you might not feel all of this. But if you’re curious, or if you’re one of those younger souls already walking with wisdom, you’re welcome to keep reading. This message is for the Elders. For those of us who should know better. And yes—I’m including myself. Let’s Start With the Mirror I’ve got to confess something. I’ve been guilty. Guilty of being reactionary. Guilty of falling into the trap of conservatism. Guilty of romanticizing the past. Guilty of looking at our young people and calling them “soft”—as if we were born warriors, as if we didn’t have to become who we are through fire, failure, and guidance. Many of us Elders are stuck in a loop. We remember only the highlights of our youth—the toughest times we survived, the boldest moments ...

Black Power ≠ Black Supremacy: Shifting the Conversation from Distraction to Definition

Black Power ≠ Black Supremacy: Shifting the Conversation from Distraction to Definition

Great Day, Family.
This morning hit me with a wave of insight. What you’re about to read is one of three articles that came to me before breakfast. The ideas were flowing so strong, I had to stop, reflect, and bring them to you straight—unfiltered, but focused.

Let’s talk about something I heard in a study group that made me pause:

“When we talk about Black Power… shouldn’t we be worried about Black Supremacy?”

That was the question posed. And I sat with it, not because it was a deep question—but because it’s a familiar one. One of those questions that burns up energy and resources trying to respond to it. And that, right there, is part of the problem.

Let’s break it down.


The Art of the Goalpost Shuffle

Sometimes, people ask questions they haven’t even fully thought through. Other times, they’re intentionally vague—questions designed not to discover truth, but to derail it.

The problem isn’t always the answer. The problem is the lack of clarity in the question itself. This is why I’ve begun replacing the term “racism” with “anti-Blackness.” Because racism is shapeless, slippery—it takes any form you want it to. But anti-Blackness? That’s specific. That’s traceable. That’s accountable.

We need that same precision when we talk about Black Power and the idea—often tossed out like a smoke bomb—of Black Supremacy.


Define It Before You Debate It

If someone says “Black Supremacy,” here’s the move: ask them to define it.
Don’t get dragged into philosophical debates built on vague language. Pull it into the light. Define the term. Write it down. Record it. Hold it still long enough to examine it.

Most people can’t define “Black Supremacy” without referencing fear, projection, or hypothetical extremes. And when they do reach for examples, they might mention isolated revolutionary moments, like Papa Doc in Haiti or fictionalized revolts. But history—and I mean actual, factual history—tells a different story.


We’ve Never Seen It—Because It’s Never Been Allowed

Let me say this clearly: We’ve never truly seen a Black supremacist state. Not in the last 500 years. What we’ve seen are Black faces performing within white supremacist systems. That’s not Black Power—that’s white supremacy wearing a Black mask.

In many revolutionary moments, especially those led by Black people, outside capitalist and colonial forces moved swiftly to undermine, destabilize, or outright destroy them. Why? Because the existence of Black Power—even the possibility of it—threatens the foundation of global white supremacy.

If communism couldn’t exist in one country without attack from capitalist nations, why would you think Black Power could survive in isolation?


Black Power Doesn’t Mean Domination

We don’t need to look far to see what Black Power looks like when it operates at the highest level—it’s in our own African history.

Black civilizations thrived on diversity. We embraced multiple languages, religions, and cultural practices. Our systems didn’t require the oppression of others. In fact, our openness was our strength—and some might say, our vulnerability. We were so inclusive that we allowed outside ideologies—like capitalism and white supremacy—to walk right in the door.

Black Power has never meant domination. It has meant survival, self-definition, and sovereignty.


Ask the Right Questions

When someone asks about Black Supremacy, guide them gently but firmly toward the truth:

  • What do you mean by “Black Supremacy”?

  • Can you show me where it has existed in history, especially in the last 500 years?

  • Are you mistaking Black self-determination for domination?

  • Are you prepared to look at how Black power has historically operated?

Nine times out of ten, what they fear isn’t Black Supremacy—it’s Black Liberation.


Let’s Reclaim the Conversation

We don’t owe anyone the emotional labor of endless, circular debates. Not when we can use that energy to build. Let’s use clarity, history, and self-determined language to reclaim our power.

Because what we’re talking about isn’t domination. It’s restoration. It’s returning to a way of being that recognizes the humanity in all people while honoring the truth of who we are.

So no—we’re not seeking Black Supremacy.

We’re seeking balance. We’re seeking justice. We’re seeking freedom.

And if that scares anyone… maybe they should ask themselves why.

Peace.
– Brother ha2tim

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

GNJ Mall - April 27

How to pour Libations

Unlocking the Power of Honor: A Guiding Light for Our Tribe's Future